Understanding the Hearsay Rule in New Jersey Courts

Understanding the Hearsay Rule in New Jersey Courts

The hearsay rule is a critical component of evidence law that often confuses non-lawyers. It generally prohibits the use of out-of-court statements to prove the truth of the matter asserted. This rule ensures that evidence presented in court is reliable and subject to cross-examination.

Definition and Explanation of the Hearsay Rule

Hearsay in New Jersey Courts is defined as an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the testifying witness, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. For example, if a witness testifies, "John told me he saw the accident," this statement is hearsay if offered to prove that John indeed saw the accident.

The primary rationale behind the hearsay rule is to prevent unreliable evidence from being presented in court. Since the original speaker is not present to be cross-examined, the statement's accuracy and trustworthiness cannot be adequately assessed.

Objections to Hearsay

When an attorney encounters hearsay evidence, they can object by stating, "Objection, hearsay." The judge will then decide whether the statement falls under the hearsay definition and whether any exceptions apply. If the judge sustains the objection, the hearsay evidence is excluded from the trial.

Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule

Despite the general prohibition, there are numerous exceptions to the hearsay rule, recognizing that some out-of-court statements are sufficiently reliable. These exceptions include but are not limited to:

Present Sense Impression

A present sense impression is a statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or immediately thereafter. For example, if someone says, "It's raining hard," while observing the rain, this statement can be admissible under the present sense impression exception.

Excited Utterance

An excited utterance is a statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event. For instance, a statement like, "He has a gun!" made during or immediately after seeing someone with a gun, qualifies as an excited utterance.

Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition

Statements that describe the declarant's then-existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition, such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health, are admissible. An example is a statement like, "I feel sick," made by a person experiencing illness.

Statements for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment

Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment, describing medical history, past or present symptoms, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source of the symptoms, are admissible. For example, a patient's statement to a doctor, "I was hit by a car," is admissible under this exception.

Recorded Recollection

A recorded recollection is a record that is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately. If the record was made or adopted by the witness when the matter was fresh in their memory and accurately reflects their knowledge, it can be read into evidence.

Business Records

Business records exception allows the admission of records of regularly conducted activity, provided they were made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, someone with knowledge, and kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity. An example is a company's financial statements prepared in the regular course of business.

Public Records

Records of a public office or agency, setting forth the activities of the office or matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law, are admissible under this exception. For instance, a police report detailing an officer’s observations at the scene of an accident can be admissible.

Sample Objections to Hearsay

When an attorney encounters hearsay evidence, they can object by stating, "Objection, hearsay." The judge will then decide whether the statement falls under the hearsay definition and whether any exceptions apply. If the judge sustains the objection, the hearsay evidence is excluded from the trial.

What to Look For

Questions that ask the witness to talk about something that he or she did not personally observe.

Object and Respond

Objection:

“Objection! Hearsay.”

Potential Responses to Objection:

A. [Non-Hearsay/State of Mind]:“Your Honor, I’m not offering this statement to prove its truth; rather, I’m offering it to show the state of mind of the declarant.”

B. [Non-Hearsay/Notice]:“Your Honor, I’m not offering this statement to prove its truth; rather, I’m offering it to show notice (or knowledge) on the part of the recipient.”

C. [Non-Hearsay/Admission]:“Your Honor, this is an admission.” Admissions can always be used against the parties that make them; they are not even considered to be hearsay under the rules.

D. [Non-Hearsay/Inconsistency]:“Your Honor, the offered prior statement contradicts the statement just made by this witness. Prior inconsistent statements are not hearsay.”

E. [Recognized Hearsay Exception]:“Your Honor, the offered statement falls within the ___________ hearsay exception.

F. [Residual Exception]:“The offered statement is trustworthy and more probative than any other obtainable evidence on the subject; opposing counsel was told about the intended use of this testimony.”

Replies to Responses:

A. [Universal Reply for any attempt to use hearsay]:“The statement is not trustworthy.”

B. [Reply to Response E]:“Opposing counsel has not presented a proper foundation for the exception that he or she claims.”

Conclusion

Understanding the hearsay rule and its exceptions is crucial for presenting reliable evidence in court. While the rule generally excludes out-of-court statements, the numerous exceptions acknowledge that some statements are inherently trustworthy and necessary for the administration of justice. Whether you are involved in a legal dispute or simply seeking to understand the intricacies of evidence law, knowing the hearsay rule and its exceptions can significantly impact the outcome of a case.

---

Contact us today to discuss your business or legal matter. Put our 20+ years of legal experience to work for you.

---

For detailed insights and legal assistance on topics discussed in this post, including litigation, contact the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont at our Bergen County Office. We're here to answer your questions and provide legal advice. Contact us at (201) 904-2211 or email us at  info@pjlesq.com.

Interested in More Legal Insights?

Explore our range of resources on business and legal matters. Subscribe to our podcast and YouTube channel for a wealth of information covering various business and legal topics. For specific inquiries or to discuss your legal matter with an attorney from our team, please email me directly at pl@pjlesq.com or call at (201) 904-2211. Your questions are important to us, and we look forward to providing the answers you need.

About Peter J. Lamont, Esq.

Peter J. Lamont is a nationally recognized attorney with significant experience in business, contract, litigation, and real estate law. With over two decades of legal practice, he has represented a wide array of businesses, including large international corporations. Peter is known for his practical legal and business advice, prioritizing efficient and cost-effective solutions for his clients.

Peter has an Avvo 10.0 Rating and has been acknowledged as one of America's Most Honored Lawyers since 2011. 201 Magainze and Lawyers of Distinction have also recognized him for being one of the top business and litigation attorneys in New Jersey. His commitment to his clients and the legal community is further evidenced by his active role as a speaker, lecturer, and published author in various legal and business publications.

As the founder of the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont, Peter brings his Wall Street experience and client-focused approach to New Jersey, offering personalized legal services that align with each client's unique needs and goals​.

---

DISCLAIMERS: The contents of this website and post are intended to convey general information only and not to provide legal advice or opinions. The contents of this website and the posting and viewing of the information on this website should not be construed as, and should not be relied upon for, legal or tax advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. Nothing on this website is an offer to represent you, and nothing on this website is intended to create an attorney‑client relationship. An attorney-client relationship may only be established through direct attorney‑to‑client communication that is confirmed by the execution of an engagement agreement.

As with any legal issue, it is important that you obtain competent legal counsel before making any decisions about how to respond to a subpoena or whether to challenge one - even if you believe that compliance is not required. Because each situation is different, it may be impossible for this article to address all issues raised by every situation encountered in responding to a subpoena. The information below can give you guidance regarding some common issues related to subpoenas, but you should consult with an attorney before taking any actions (or refraining from acts) based on these suggestions. Separately, this post will focus on New Jersey law. If you receive a subpoena in a state other than New Jersey, you should immediately seek the advice of an attorney in your state, as certain rules differ in other states.

Disclaimer: Recognition by Legal Awards

The legal awards and recognitions mentioned above are not an endorsement or a guarantee of future performance. These honors reflect an attorney's past achievements and should not be considered as predictors of future results. They are not intended to compare one lawyer's services with other lawyers' services. The process for selecting an attorney for these awards can vary and may not include a review of the lawyer's competence in specific areas of practice. Potential clients should perform their own evaluation when seeking legal representation. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.